![]() ![]() I see DNGs as a useful RAW file format and given the opportunity to write DNGs in the camera as some dozen manufacturers already do would be optimum. Lightroom will always be able to read your NEF format so there is no worry that the NEF will somehow become obsolete. Lightroom reads your NEF the same as it reads your DNG. Converting to DNG only slows the import process and adds additional overhead. The real solution is to have sufficient file backups to recover. Opening the file to discover that it can’t be read because of bit rot achieves the same end result as a Checksum tally. ![]() Checksums tell you that the contented of the file have degraded. Disk storage is relatively inexpensive so it matters little it you simply convert to DNG for smaller files.ģ. To that end it seems pointless to create a RAW DNG that contains the RAW contents of the NEF if you are going to keep the NEF.Ģ. I would recommend always keeping the NEF for future proofing. It is the original file and Nikon may develop future technology to improve the images based upon the content of the data stored in the Nikon file header. But thee same apps also handle the NEFsġ. ![]() DNG are a public format and all apps should be able to handle the DNG format. Built in Checksum So they you can tell if the DNG file has gone bad.Ģ. In the for DNG conversion, the pluses are:ġ. You will get answers the fall on both sides of the question. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |